This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch RFC] A few SH specific changes for top level libgcc
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:49:17 -0500
- Subject: Re: [patch RFC] A few SH specific changes for top level libgcc
- References: <20070109.082759.57447471.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:27:59AM +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attatched patch is a trial of SH specific changes for
> top level libgcc. Actually, it's sh-linux specific.
> Bootstrap and regtested with the top level "make -k check"
> on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu, though I'm using the patch in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00494.html
> to avoid PR29746 which blocks bootstrap on sh4-linux.
> Dan, does it look OK?
It looks right to me, too.
> sh-*-elf* | sh[12346l]*-*-elf* | sh*-*-kaos* | \
> sh-*-symbianelf* | sh[12346l]*-*-symbianelf* | \
> - sh-*-linux* | sh[346lbe]*-*-linux* | \
> sh-*-netbsdelf* | shl*-*-netbsdelf* | sh5-*-netbsd* | sh5l*-*-netbsd* | \
> sh64-*-netbsd* | sh64l*-*-netbsd*)
> ;;
> +sh-*-linux* | sh[346lbe]*-*-linux*)
> + tmake_file="${tmake_file} sh/t-linux"
> + ;;
The nested case used in config.gcc is a little strange, but you might
want to duplicate it here - Paolo suggested that keeping the same
cases in this file as in gcc/config.gcc will make it easier to
compare the two.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery