This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] CSE some calls to compare_values


On 1/7/07, Kaveh R. GHAZI <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:

> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
> Applied to mainline.
> Richard.
>
> 2007-01-07  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>
>
>         * tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_assert): CSE calls to
>         compare_values where possible.
>         (extract_range_from_unary_expr): Likewise.


Wouldn't it be more natural to apply atttribute const or pure to compare_values() and let the optimizer to this for you (everywhere)?

Well, we'd lie to the compiler as compare_values has side-effects. It shouldn't break anything but I remember we concluded not to like it. (We could also "safely" mark build_int_cst pure for example)

Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]