This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net (Gabriel Dos Reis)
- Cc: Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM (Joe Buck), iant at google dot com (Ian Lance Taylor), dje at watson dot ibm dot com (David Edelsohn), gerald at pfeifer dot com (Gerald Pfeifer), gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:16:51 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule
>
> Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:26:27AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> | > David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:
> | >
> | > > Are 4.0 snapshots still necessary? I suspect they should be
> | > > discontinued.
> | >
> | > 4.0 still seems to be regarded as an active branch.
> | >
> | > I don't mind closing it, myself. Does anybody think we should have a
> | > 4.0.4 release?
> |
> | I'd like to see it closed. We have some bugs that are only open because
> | they are targeted for 4.0.4 (fixed on all branches but 4_0).
> |
> | If Gaby's interested in doing one final release first, I'm fine with that.
> | But I'd like to see it go away.
>
> Almost everybody has switched to 4.1+, but I've heard that sony people
> might still be using 4.0.x based compiler.
We are still using a 4.0.2 based compiler but we already have plans to
move to 4.1.x sometime in the next month or three.
-- pinski