This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Stricter implicit conversions between vectors, revised patch
Mark Shinwell wrote:
What is this problem?
Given what you say, I believe there is no problem. I'll run the testsuite
again; it looks like we are finally there.
...but not quite. Having just been discussing this with Joseph Myers it
looks like the existing compatibility rules are still in fact correct, and
another nuance has been pointed out: there shouldn't be multiple "inform"
calls about -flax-vector-conversions for i18n reasons.