This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch, libgomp, docs] adding documentation to libgomp
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Cc: Daniel Franke <franke dot daniel at gmail dot com>, gerald at pfeifer dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:58:08 -0500
- Subject: Re: [patch, libgomp, docs] adding documentation to libgomp
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <456CC7E6.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Daniel Berlin wrote on 12/10/06 20:58:
Daniel just pointed out to me this paragraph from
Diego, just an FYI, I believe you can approve patches to docs that are
for area you maintain.
Or is it that we just are allowed to modify them.
Gerald, can you clarify (and review this kind person's texinfo formatting)?
"Maintainers of a port maintain the files in config/port/, the configure
fragments for the port, documentation for the port and test cases for
features or bugs specific to this port. Port maintainers do not have
approval rights in other files."
I think that solves the issue. Daniel, your patch is fine. If I
overstepped any boundaries, maybe we should clarify this a bit more.