This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH RFA: Support -Wmissing-declarations in C++


On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Mark Mitchell wrote:

| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| > | "templatized functions" is not a standard term; please say "function
| > | templates" (or "specializations of function templates").  Also, you've
| > | exempted members of anonymous namespaces, so that should be documented too.
| >
| > The warning should NOT be conditionalized on the fact that the function is
| > *explicitly* declared inline.  It suffices that it is inline.  There
| > is no need for the artificial distinction.
|
| I agree.  But, I think this is just a documentation change.

OK, that is great!

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]