This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PR 30089: Fix ICE in operand allocation


On 12/14/06, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> wrote:
Hi,
> It may be, yes.  We shouldn't need the static buffer for long,
> hopefully.  Andrew is changing this code.  I will try to adjust it down
> in the meantime.

looks like I incorrectly blamed you instead of myself.  At least one
problem is that statement annotation grew up rather than reduced with my
histogram change.  This is because I moved bitfields down in the
structure to allow better packing on 64bit and wrongly updated after
your merge.

Committed as obvoius, lets hope that it will bring the memory
consumption back.

There's more low-hanging fruit (for 64bit systems)


2006-12-14 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>

       * tree-flow.h (struct var_ann_d): Move escape_mask for
       better structure packing.

Attachment: p
Description: Binary data


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]