This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
> In fact, I considered that earlier to fix the Java problem I had after > the TER changes, and again to fix you Ada bug report. I opted for > updating the CFG in cse_insn because it seems to me that this is the > most transparent: Make all changes necessary after an insn change as > close as possible to the code where the insn change occurs.
Then why not updating it at the very end of cse_insn once for all?
Attached is what I had been toying with for the Ada failure. I haven't tested this at all but it gives you an idea.
> Should more cases surface of this assert being triggerd, I guess we'll > just have to update the CFG in cse_extended_basic_block after all.
How many more cases? :-)
Gr. Steven
Attachment:
ttt
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |