This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Make CSE path following use the CFG


On 12/14/06, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> wrote:
> In fact, I considered that earlier to fix the Java problem I had after
> the TER changes, and again to fix you Ada bug report. I opted for
> updating the CFG in cse_insn because it seems to me that this is the
> most transparent: Make all changes necessary after an insn change as
> close as possible to the code where the insn change occurs.

Then why not updating it at the very end of cse_insn once for all?

Could do that too.


Attached is what I had been toying with for the Ada failure.  I
haven't tested this at all but it gives you an idea.

> Should more cases surface of this assert being triggerd, I guess we'll
> just have to update the CFG in cse_extended_basic_block after all.

How many more cases? :-)

One :-)


Gr.
Steven

Attachment: ttt
Description: Binary data


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]