This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bounds-checking for Fortran testsuite was: Re: [gfortran, testsuite] Fix bounds checking for substrings, enable bounds chekcing in dg testsuite, assorted fixes
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- Cc: Dorit Nuzman <dorit at il dot ibm dot com>, janis187 at us dot bim dot com, Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>, Thomas Koenig <Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:33:37 -0800
- Subject: Re: Bounds-checking for Fortran testsuite was: Re: [gfortran, testsuite] Fix bounds checking for substrings, enable bounds chekcing in dg testsuite, assorted fixes
- References: <OFD35CB343.0B772F83-ONC2257242.004D53AD-C2257242.004DDE15@il.ibm.com> <20061212201907.p89usy7u0ow8kk88@webmail.physik.uni-muenchen.de>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:19:07PM +0100, Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> [ Sorry, I hit send to early before ]
>
> Dorit Nuzman <DORIT@il.ibm.com> wrote on Tue, 12 Dec 2006:
> >The vect testsuite is supposed to exercise all the different features of
> >the vectorizer, but surely we could use more testing (especially if it's
> >loop intensive code).
>
> Ok, this is my candidate for a final patch which incorporates the
> logic from vect.exp to determine on which targets it makes sense to
> exercise -ftree-vectorize. Janis, can you look over the changes to
> the testsuite framework, please. The change to the Fortran FE has
> already been ok'ed by FX.
This is OK.
Sometime soon I might move the code that puts together the vectorizer
options to lib/target-supports.exp so it can be shared by other torture
suites, but I wouldn't want to delay this patch to try to do that.
Janis