This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [gfortran, testsuite] Fix bounds checking for substrings, enable bounds chekcing in dg testsuite, assorted fixes


Dorit Nuzman <DORIT@il.ibm.com> wrote on Tue, 12 Dec 2006:

Tobias Schlüter <tobias.schlueter@physik.uni-muenchen.de> wrote on
12/12/2006 16:00:15:

Dorit Nuzman <DORIT@il.ibm.com> wrote on Sun, 10 Dec 2006:
>> WRT the rest of the discussion, I'd like to point out that -O3
>> -ftree-vectorize currently ICEs on a few testcases (PR30087), which is
>
> Does this patch fix the problem?:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-12/msg00267.html

I can't tell.  After a few days of not being able to bootstrap, I'm
now running into trouble with the testsuite: the linker invoked in the
testsuite doesn't find libgfortranbegin.

> To overcome the problem Andrew mentions here -
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00532.html,
> you can look at how gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp computes which target options
to
> use with -ftree-vectorize.

This looks very useful, thanks for the pointer.  Do you think that it
makes sense to test gfortran with -ftree-vectorize or are vect
testsuites comprehensive enough?


The vect testsuite is supposed to exercise all the different features of the vectorizer, but surely we could use more testing (especially if it's loop intensive code).

dorit

Thanks,
- Tobi

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.








---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]