This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/28690, indexed load/store performance + reload bug


On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 17:36 +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Michael Matz wrote:
> > Bummer.  I still don't understand why find_reg could chose register 65
> > although it's not in the register class contents for pseudo 238, patched
> > or unpatched compiler.
> 
> I think this is the really interesting question here ...
[snip]
> I agree that insns should be recogizable at all times.  So we need to find
> out why reg 65 is placed there: if this is incorrect, we need to fix it,
> if it is correct, we'd have to adapt the predicate along the lines Michael
> points out.

Ok, I'll track down why/how we end up assigning reg 65 to pseudo 238.


Peter




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]