Re: [PATCH][C++] Fix PR29433, make C++ use a lot less time/memory

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu>]

Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> writes:

| Hi,
| 
| On Sun, 9 Dec 2006, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| 
| > | More importantly, we know that this code is in our testsuite, in 
| > | libstdc++, and accepted by EDG -- all of which suggests that this 
| > | construct is likely in relatively widespread use.  I'm not sure that 
| > | it's a good tradeoff to break that code for the sake of a diagnostic 
| > | which is explicitly not required by the standard.
| > 
| > And the code is explicitly invalid.  And we already reject the code,
| 
| We don't currently, that's exactly the point of this thread.  

   % g++ -v && cat mm.C && g++ mm.C  
   Using built-in specs.
   Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
   Configured with: /home/gdr/redhat/trunk.gcc/configure
   --prefix=/home/gdr --enable-languages=c++
   Thread model: posix
   gcc version 4.3.0 20061109 (experimental)
   struct T { };
   struct S {
      T T();
   };
   mm.C:3: error: declaration of 'T S::T()'
   mm.C:1: error: changes meaning of 'T' from 'struct T'


I don't believe Richard's patch is in yet.

-- Gaby