This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch, libgomp, docs] adding documentation to libgomp
- From: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: "Daniel Franke" <franke dot daniel at gmail dot com>, gerald at pfeifer dot com
- Cc: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 20:58:37 -0500
- Subject: Re: [patch, libgomp, docs] adding documentation to libgomp
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <456CC7E6.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
On 12/10/06, Daniel Franke <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Thursday 30 November 2006 21:58, Daniel Franke wrote:
> > >
> > > PR libgomp/28209
> > > * libgomp.texi: New file.
> > > * configure.ac: Add --enable-generated-files-in-srcdir option.
> > > * Makefile.am Add info, dvi, pdf, html targets. On request, copy files
> > > to srcdir.
> > > * Makefile.in: Regenerated.
> > > * config.h.in: Regenerated.
> > > * testsuite/Makefile.in: Regenerated.
> > > * NOTES: Removed.
> On Wednesday 29 November 2006 00:36, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > I can't approve the configury bits. The documentation looks OK with
> > some changes below. You'll need to have a doc maintainer go over the
> > texinfo formatting.
> Now waiting for approval of the texinfo/configury parts.
Diego, just an FYI, I believe you can approve patches to docs that are
for area you maintain.
Or is it that we just are allowed to modify them.
Gerald, can you clarify (and review this kind person's texinfo formatting)?