This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Canonical types (1/3)
Doug Gregor wrote:
What was wrong with that patch to 19163, anyway? Browsing the
archives, I don't see a reason for its rejection...
About this, I think you are right that the public archives don't tell
the whole story, not quickly and clearly at least ;) If you want, I
think you should have a look to the audit trail of C++/17743 too. As far
as I can remember, the issue turned out to be much larger than it seemed
at first, with additional info needing to be propagated on the trees....