This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gfortran, testsuite] Fix bounds checking for substrings, enable bounds chekcing in dg testsuite, assorted fixes
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Tobias Schl?ter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 09:29:37 -0800
- Subject: Re: [gfortran, testsuite] Fix bounds checking for substrings, enable bounds chekcing in dg testsuite, assorted fixes
- References: <20061125025430.8ir73wr1sswggww0@webmail.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <20061205180522.u43tuxeopw8ow0cs@webmail.physik.uni-muenchen.de>
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:05:22PM +0100, Tobias Schl?ter wrote:
> Tobias Schl?ter <tobias.schlueter@physik.uni-muenchen.de> wrote on
> Sat, 25 Nov 2006:
> >The list of options that we cycle through with this patch is:
> > set TORTURE_OPTIONS [list \
> > { -O0 } { -O1 } { -O2 } \
> > { -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions } \
> > { -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops } \
> > { -O2 -fbounds-check } \
> > { -O2 -fno-repack-arrays } \
> > { -O3 -g } \
> > { -Os }]
> >while previously, the dg testsuite would cycle through the following list
> > { -O0 } \
> > { -O1 } \
> > { -O2 } \
> > { -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer } \
> > { -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops } \
> > { -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions }
> > \
> > { -O3 -g } \
> > { -Os }
> >
> >This is a good time to speak up if you think that list is too long,
> >your favorite option is missing, etc. I'm open to suggestions how to
> >shorten this list, as in its current incarnation the patch will grow
> >the list of options by 12.5%
>
> Since PR30003 is about to be fixed, I'd like to bring this question
> back to the front. What options would we liek the testsuite to cycle
> through. According to FX' suggestion, I replaced -fno-repack-arrays
> by -ftree-vectorize in my local tree. Are you ok with cycling through
> one more option, or would you rather see somethign cropped from the
> list?
>
What is the value of "-O3 -g"? For the testsuite, I think we should
drop the "-g".
--
Steve