This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH,RFC] CSE path following on basic blocks
On 11/28/06, Paolo Bonzini <email@example.com> wrote:
Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On 11/28/06, Eric Botcazou <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> ! /* There is a previous path. Make sure it started with FIRST_BB. */
>> ! if (path_size)
>> ! gcc_assert (data->path.bb = first_bb);
>> Not sure what you're trying to do here. Or maybe an annoying typo?
> If there is a path in data, then we're going to discover a new path
> starting with
> data->path.bb. But Passing first_bb may be unnecessary.
But you have only one '=' above... :-)
Ah. How silly...
That could also explain why I get different code with checking enabled
vs. checking disabled ;-)
Then you could also replace "label:" with "label:;"
And so it is done. I didn't know you could do this. Thanks!