This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PINGx2][Patch]: multilib fixes for libjava


    Can someone who maintains the build machinery review the patch
to fix multilib builds of -m64 on 32-bit processors. The proposed
patch was posted...

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg00493.html

The Darwin developers are okay with the patch (since it
allows a G4 or non-EMT64 Intel machine to build multilib)...

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01225.html

The java developers have approved the java/boehm-gc/zlib parts...

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01191.html

I would appreciate a final review and checkin before bit-rot
starts to set in.
         Jack
ps I consider this to also fix a regression on gcc 4.2 branch
because of the following reasoning. The gcc 4.2 release defaults
to a multilib build and will fail on 32-bit processors unless
an additional --disable-multilib flag is passed to configure.
My understanding is that amounts to an regression since the
build process shouldn't be picking up additional configure
flags unless absolutely necessary.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]