This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] New port of Cell SPU

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: trevor_smigiel at playstation dot sony dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Andrew_Pinski at playstation dot sony dot com, Russell_Olsen at playstation dot sony dot com
Date: 20 Nov 2006 23:59:12 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New port of Cell SPU
References: <20061103231015.GC17248@playstation.sony.com> <20061109233728.GF28330@playstation.sony.com> <20061115192940.GQ28330@playstation.sony.com> <20061117023900.GJ20100@playstation.sony.com> <4562152B.1050101@codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

[...]

| However, I found the use of "static inline" in the C++ intrinsics
| surprising. 

There is also the fact that "static" functions cannot be found in
templates (if the calls are dependent). Maybe that is not a problem if
the functions are intended to never appear in templates.  But, it
needs documenting.

-- Gaby

References:
- [PATCH] New port of Cell SPU
  - From: trevor_smigiel
- Re: [PATCH] New port of Cell SPU
  - From: trevor_smigiel
- Re: [PATCH] New port of Cell SPU
  - From: trevor_smigiel
- Re: [PATCH] New port of Cell SPU
  - From: trevor_smigiel
- Re: [PATCH] New port of Cell SPU
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]