This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Enforce GMP/MPFR version requires and fix fortran/28276,27021
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:43:27 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enforce GMP/MPFR version requires and fix fortran/28276,27021
- References: <20060912212027.GA63335@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20060925043645.GA51769@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4517C63D.email@example.com> <20060925175312.GA55525@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20060925190034.GB10217@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <email@example.com>
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> I have followed the rules as outlined here:
> I'm happy to update the contribution to say that it is highly
> recommended to use patchqueue signals if nobody has a problem with it.
I recommend to make this read "recommended", but yes, this sounds like a
good addition to make your patchqueue system more prominent!