This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PING][Patch]: multilib fixes for libjava
My mistake. The correct message with the original patch is
Sorry about that.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 03:51:39PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Jack Howarth writes:
> > Can I get a review on...
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-11/msg00091.html
> > ...at least for gcc trunk before bit rot sets
> > in?
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to post an actual patch to gcc-patches,
> with a ChangeLog?
> Lest anyone think this is waiting on me, let me say that I have no
> problem with this. It is for Darwin maintainers to comment.
> But they won't see it, because Darwin does not appear in the Subject
> line and libjava does.