This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: fix bugs in likely_spilled_retval_1 / likely_spilled_retval_p (Was: Re: RFA: Fix rtl-optimization/22258)


Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:

On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 05:54:38PM +0000, Joern RENNECKE wrote:



As of revision Revision 118652, I still see an 'events output' regression
when I compare the FAILs from the pristine bootstrap with the one
of the patched sources:


FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)


27c28
< FAIL: Thread_Alive -O3 execution - source compiled test
---


FAIL: events output



Something is weird in my end.


Something seems to be weird everywhere. I re-tried the regression test on the
compile farm using 118663 as a baseline, and I get different regressions:


106a107,108
> FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
> FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test

amylaar@gcc01:~/bld/2006-11-10-22258/gcc/gcc$ grep ^FAIL !$
grep ^FAIL ~/bld/2006-11-10-22258/i686/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava/testsuite/libjava.log
FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]