This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Re: [C++ PATCH] C++0x static assertions
On 07 Nov 2006 23:42:28 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis
Douglas Gregor <email@example.com> writes:
could we simplify the ugliness and do without __static_assert, and
If we don't care to use static_assert inside libstdc++ (or we want to
fall back to library-only solutions when we're not in C++0x mode),
yes, we can simplify. I'm CC'ing libstdc++; if anyone wants to use
static_assert in the library, they should speak up :)
| 2006-11-07 Douglas Gregor <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Don't we need the corresponding pretty-printing?
I always forget the pretty-printing. I'll add it.