This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] MIPS: Size optimization costs.

On Nov 6, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:

Eric Christopher <> writes:
Too much indentation: the COST_N_INSNS() lines are too indented.
OK otherwise.

I'm not a great fan of the current MIPS cost model, not least because
it fails to take things like -mhard-float and -msoft-float into
However, your patch is a strict improvement on what we have now.

FWIW a simple improvement on this would be to bias the cost count in favor of the cheaper instructions, i.e. multiplication over division using something like CONST_N_INSNS(1) + 1.

I don't think that's a good idea. The expressions given to rtx_costs can be arbitrarily complex, and taken literally, the higher cost would suggest that 4 divisions have the same cost as 5 multiplications.

Yeah, I've just never seen a case where we've done something like that in the middle end. I'm willing to stipulate it could happen though.

If we're optimising for size, I think something should only have
a higher cost if it really is bigger.  Adding +1 to the cost of X
might be appropriate if using X sometimes causes extra code to
be generated (e.g. if we sometimes have to insert nops to avoid
pipeline hazards).

That's a good idea though.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]