This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: add #define to revert C99 inlining behaviour



On 03/11/2006, at 8:03 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:


On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 18:59 -0800, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
Apparently it is 'controversial' that -std=c99 should implement C99.

So, here is a #define. You can switch it off, on again, off again, on
again, and so on, to your heart's delight.

Didn't we agree on an option instead of a define inside GCC?

I don't remember that discussion, and I know I didn't agree to implement an option, although I have no objection to an option if someone wants to implement it. This define is simply a more convenient way of backing out the patch, if that's what people want to do; and it points you at the places to change if you want an option, if that's what people want to do; and if we decide to go for no option, then end-users who absolutely can't deal with it can always flip the #define.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]