This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC/PATCH] Standardize on "for (;;)" for unbounded loops
Richard Kenner writes:
> > To be frank, I think this particular point of style is so unimportant as
> > not to be worth standardizing. :-)
> Despite my strong feelings in favor of standardization, I'm inclined to
> agree with you in this particular case.
> > That said, I'd be perfectly happy with your suggested form, and I'd
> > encourage others to weigh in on the issue of whether or not to
> > standardize on anything, rather than quibbling over which form is
> > best, which seems far too bikeshedish. :-)
There are several branches that are very active, including one I care
very much about -- a big rewrite of the Java langauge front-end.
Anything that complicates merging is probably a Bad Thing.