This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC/PATCH] Standardize on "for (;;)" for unbounded loops


Richard Kenner writes:
 > > To be frank, I think this particular point of style is so unimportant as 
 > > not to be worth standardizing. :-)  
 > 
 > Despite my strong feelings in favor of standardization, I'm inclined to
 > agree with you in this particular case.
 > 
 > > That said, I'd be perfectly happy with your suggested form, and I'd
 > > encourage others to weigh in on the issue of whether or not to
 > > standardize on anything, rather than quibbling over which form is
 > > best, which seems far too bikeshedish. :-)

There are several branches that are very active, including one I care
very much about -- a big rewrite of the Java langauge front-end.
Anything that complicates merging is probably a Bad Thing.

Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]