This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR29490 - ICE whilst building formal/actual interface

FX Coudert wrote:
In this case, trans-types.c(gfc_get_nodesc_array_type)
and gfc_set_interface_mapping_bounds.  The solution is to use
the descriptor values for both bounds.  The testcase is that
provided by the reporter.

I would just like confirmation that, if GFC_TYPE_ARRAY_LBOUND is not set, then GFC_TYPE_ARRAY_UBOUND is garanteed not to be set either. Perhaps an assert in the code would help?
Do a grep on GFC_TYPE_ARRAY_LBOUND and GFC_TYPE_ARRAY_UBOUND. You will find that if the former is not set then the latter is not. However, if this were not to be the case, it would make more sense to set LBOUND from UBOUND, rather than to do an assert. I could put that branch in, if you like.

BTW ironically, I was unable to find a call sequence that made use of this array declaration; possibly it exists but I could not find a use for it.


Thanks - I will commit on Saturday or Sunday, when I am back at base.


PS I finally got so sick and tired of my ISP's email web interface that I decided to shift email to my portable permanently

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]