This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bootstrap failures

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:50:54 -0400
Subject: Re: Bootstrap failures
References: <20061020170400.GA2835@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <4aca3dc20610201009v5620853cre4a13c22ed3d3a1b@mail.gmail.com> <20061021112227.GA9408@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <4aca3dc20610210527n4693c501qff2e126b283984ab@mail.gmail.com>

Daniel Berlin wrote on 10/21/06 08:27:

Also note that on a checking enabled compiler, insn-attrtab.i takes
 scheduling 2          : 185.76 (63%) usr   1.11 ( 3%) sys 194.83
(55%) wall    1436 kB ( 1%) ggc

on my machine.
What is up with that (this is before my patch)?

>
It's not your patch.  mem-ssa on x86_64@2.13Ghz

scheduling 2 : 226.86 (67%) usr 0.09 ( 4%) sys 227.06 (67%) wall 2154 kB ( 1%) ggc

References:
- Re: Bootstrap failures
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Bootstrap failures
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Bootstrap failures
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]