This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, ivopts] Handle type-converted IVs better

From: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
To: Adam Nemet <anemet at caviumnetworks dot com>
Cc: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 11:22:28 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH, ivopts] Handle type-converted IVs better
References: <17683.20336.795875.577770@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0609212036070.22071-100000@www.eyesopen.com> <17683.32257.683206.661191@localhost.localdomain>

Hello,

> > If it can be made into a new dejagnu test for the testsuite, even
> > better.
> 
> No unfortunately, at least not yet.  I don't think there is
> infrastructure for checking the number of induction variables ivopts
> determines.  I am planning to do something about this though.

you could probably match for something in -fdump-tree-ivopts-details, or
possibly some pattern (number of additions?) in -fdump-tree-optimized.

Zdenek

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, ivopts] Handle type-converted IVs better
  - From: Adam Nemet

References:
- Re: [PATCH, ivopts] Handle type-converted IVs better
  - From: Adam Nemet
- Re: [PATCH, ivopts] Handle type-converted IVs better
  - From: Roger Sayle
- Re: [PATCH, ivopts] Handle type-converted IVs better
  - From: Adam Nemet

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]