This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: back out dwarf2out_stack_adjust change
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: gkeating at apple dot com (Geoffrey Keating)
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com, iant at google dot com
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 02:24:49 -0300
- Subject: Re: back out dwarf2out_stack_adjust change
- References: <20060902072211.2C83C42E17E2@geoffk5.apple.com>
On Sep 2, 2006, gkeating@apple.com (Geoffrey Keating) wrote:
> Mark would prefer that I just back out Alexandre's change.
Thanks for, erhm, not letting my disappearance get in the way of
progress (I can't figure out a way to write it in such a way that it
can't possibly be read as ironic, but I can't, so let me just explain
that I'm being honest, not ironic :-)
Sorry about my extended silence.
> While preparing this change, I found out that although the C and C++
> frontends never emit nested function calls that can throw, the Java
> frontend can call library routines which can throw.
> Fortunately, the Java frontend uses asynchronous unwind tables and so
> removing Alexandre's change does not affect it.
Good.
> Here's what you'd need to do to make this routine really work:
Would it make sense to add a FIXME comment to that function, with your
bullets and a pointer to the patch that was reverted? Or maybe just a
pointer to your e-mail with the reverted patch?
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Secretary for FSF Latin America http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}