This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix PR testsuite/28950 revised

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:41:49 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix PR testsuite/28950 revised
References: <20060911010114.3F25511000B@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <jeodtmn66j.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20060911213005.GA6641@us.ibm.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 02:30:05PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > What's wrong with `r?'?
> 
> That works for powerpc64-linux and certainly should work for darwin.
> The change would be:
> 
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "rlwinm \[0-9\]+,\[0-9\]+,0,0,30"  } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "rlwinm \[0-9\]+,\[0-9\]+,0,29,30"  } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "rlwinm r?\[0-9\]+,{,r}\[0-9\]+,0,0,30"  } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "rlwinm r?\[0-9\]+,{,r}\[0-9\]+,0,29,30"  } } */

Well, the second {,r} can be replaced with r? too I guess.

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Fix PR testsuite/28950 revised
  - From: Janis Johnson

References:
- RE: [patch] Fix PR testsuite/28950 revised
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: [patch] Fix PR testsuite/28950 revised
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [patch] Fix PR testsuite/28950 revised
  - From: Janis Johnson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]