This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Off-by-one errors in gcc/config/arm/pr-support.c

From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Mark Shinwell <shinwell at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:50:55 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Off-by-one errors in gcc/config/arm/pr-support.c
References: <449AF6C1.3020604@codesourcery.com> <1155895456.9709.22.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <44E5F864.7090701@codesourcery.com> <200608181839.59844.paul@codesourcery.com>

On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 18:39, Paul Brook wrote:

> The convention of using abort()/exit(0) was removed a couple of years ago.
> 
> It was decided that returning 1 or 0 from main is sufficient because many 
> existing tests (including most of the c++ testsuite) already do this, and 
> dejagnu knows how to fix targets that are broken.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg00288.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg00320.html

Ahah!  So that explains why I could no-longer find a reference to it in
the manual.

Thanks,

R.

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Off-by-one errors in gcc/config/arm/pr-support.c
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: [PATCH] Off-by-one errors in gcc/config/arm/pr-support.c
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [PATCH] Off-by-one errors in gcc/config/arm/pr-support.c
  - From: Paul Brook

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]