This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Much fallout from PR 27668

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Lee Millward <lee dot millward at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Volker Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 08:26:35 +0100
Subject: Re: Much fallout from PR 27668
References: <tkrat.d5250a4003e46895@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> <9784d3ab0608071246h42122733o8b0edb33e983acf9@mail.gmail.com> <44D7D4F0.1090807@codesourcery.com> <9784d3ab0608081001v5690e42cga070125af0aa5980@mail.gmail.com>

Lee Millward wrote:
> On 8/8/06, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> I think that Volker's right.  Let's back the original patch out of 4.1,
>> and leave well enough alone; let's just pursue this on the mainline.
> 
> What should I do about the new bug reports for the regressions Volker
> has reported? Should I mark the patch reverting the fix for 27668 as
> fixing those bugs on the 4.1 branch and re-add the 4.1 regression
> marker to 27668 leaving the current regressions as against 4.2 only?

Yes, I think that's exactly right.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

References:
- Much fallout from PR 27668
  - From: Volker Reichelt
- Re: Much fallout from PR 27668
  - From: Lee Millward
- Re: Much fallout from PR 27668
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Much fallout from PR 27668
  - From: Lee Millward

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]