This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch,libgfortran] PR28335 flush() / write() statement on closed units

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
To: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:06:45 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch,libgfortran] PR28335 flush() / write() statement on closed units
References: <44C5A6F8.3060405@verizon.net> <44C5B9F0.7080706@gmail.com> <44C6BBB8.6050507@verizon.net>

Jerry DeLisle wrote:

FX Coudert wrote:
2006-07-24 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
    PR libgfortran/258335
    * close.c (st_close): Add error when UNIT does not exist.
    * file_pos.c (st_flush): Add error when UNIT does not exist.
Looks OK to me.

Now that we have a dg-shoudfail directive, what about testcases for these two runtime error messages?

FX
Will do!

Thanks,

Jerry

I see dg-shouldfail is not committed to 4.1 branch. I will commit the patch and query Janis on status.

ERROR: gfortran.dg/no_unit_error_2.f90 -Os : unknown dg option: dg-shouldfail 2 {UNIT is not open before FLUSH} for " dg-shouldfail 2 "UNIT is not open before FLUSH" "

Test cases will follow when able.

Regards,

Jerry

References:
- [patch,libgfortran] PR28335 flush() / write() statement on closed units
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: [patch,libgfortran] PR28335 flush() / write() statement on closed units
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [patch,libgfortran] PR28335 flush() / write() statement on closed units
  - From: Jerry DeLisle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]