This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: ebotcazou at adacore dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 01:01:29 EDT
Subject: Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
References: <20060706151010.GA25497@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200607061733.56986.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <20060706182733.GA6543@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200607062158.02615.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

> Richard, what do you think?  The end result would essentially be to prevent 
> IVs from being generating in non-base types by the tree loop optimizers.

I want to be sure of the terminology.  Does "IV" here mean what the original
loop optimizer called a "biv", a "giv" or does it refer to either?  If
the former, I agree.   Otherwise, I'm less clear.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [patch] for PRs 27639 and 26719
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]