Re: [PATCH] factor code common to all builtin_function implementations

[Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>]

On 30/06/2006, at 5:18 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote:

> On 6/29/06, Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> Hi Geoff
>
> > This large patch:
> >
> > 2006-05-02  Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com>
> >
> >         * gcc/java/decl.c: Include langhooks.h.
> >         (builtin_function): Remove.
> >         (java_init_decl_processing): Replace calls to  
> > builtin_function
> >         with add_builtin_function.
> > ...
> >
> > is OK.
>
> For trunk or LTO? Should I way untill trunk is in stage1?

It's OK for trunk (and so OK everywhere else, usually), but you still  
can't commit it to the trunk at the moment because it's not a  
regression fix or even a bugfix.  So you keep it until we get to  
stage1 but you don't need to have it reviewed again (unless you need  
to make non-obvious changes to it).

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature