This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [MinGW] PR target/19970: Java unnecessarily disabled for MinGW in top-level configure

>>>>> "David" == David Ayers <d.ayers@inode.at> writes:

David> Before I continue working on this for 4.3, I would like to have
David> a signal from the java maintainers, if they actually agree with
David> this approach in the light of:
David> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00795.html

David> in which there seems to be a reluctance to make building the runtime
David> dependant on building the front-end.

We've talked a bit about doing separate builds of libgcj so that we
can release it more quickly.

I think we ought to come to a decision about this now.  In
particular, what option(s), if any, we think we'll need.

Tom
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]