This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch,fortran] Fix PR19310 unnecessary error for overflowing results
- From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
- Cc: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 17:42:19 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch,fortran] Fix PR19310 unnecessary error for overflowing results
- References: <44890B76.6090808@verizon.net> <200606100204.39023.paul@codesourcery.com> <448A1EDA.4030804@verizon.net>
> OK, how about if I call it -frange-check, have that be the default, and the
> reverse be -fno-range-check.
>
> Does that satisfy the norm? I am just trying to be clear.
Yes.
Paul