This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR27655 - NULL as the pointer in the associated intinsic causes ICE

From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
Cc: "'fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 10:40:20 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR27655 - NULL as the pointer in the associated intinsic causes ICE
References: <447F3471.9040803@wanadoo.fr>

:REVIEWMAIL:

2006-06-01 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>

   PR fortran/25090
   * check.c (gfc_check_associated): If the pointer itself is a
   null expression, jump past the other checks to the error that
   rejects NULL pointer as an actual argument for associated.

OK. I saw you changed the label name in your later 4-fold patch submission, I don't mind the new name either :)

I'll review your patches for PR14067, PR16943, PR20838 later today or tomorrow.

FX

PS: your patch had a strange indentation in my mailer, but it might be a problem on my side... please just check it before commiting.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR27655 - NULL as the pointer in the associated intinsic causes ICE
  - From: Paul Thomas

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR27655 - NULL as the pointer in the associated intinsic causes ICE
  - From: Paul Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]