This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH PING^2 (from October/2005!) to improve -dD output

From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 09:39:17 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH PING^2 (from October/2005!) to improve -dD output
References: <44690D0E.6060106@bothner.com> <4473C08C.90607@bothner.com>

Per Bothner wrote:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg00836.html
This never got approved.  I just re-ran a boostrap and check,
and there were no regressions.
Is this Ok for the trunk?


Since no-one has commented, I'm tempted to define this as a
"cpplib" issue or perhaps as "obvious" and just check it in ...


Nobody objected to my declaring this a "cpplib issue". so
I checked it in.
--
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]