This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert at CS dot UCLA dot EDU>
Cc: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, bug-coreutils at gnu dot org, aldyh at redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:36:22 -0700
Subject: Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests
References: <20060503054051.GA14396@panix.com> <87fyjqdbm2.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <4A073DAA-A052-4795-A94C-DCDFEB93DB92@apple.com> <BA353D57-4D02-46A1-9C9A-79B6AA4AB9EA@physics.uc.edu> <8764juo9a0.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>

On May 25, 2006, at 12:25 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:


Can somebody please reopen bug #27434 and apply its patch to GCC?
Unlike the patches proposed for 14251, the 27434 patch shouldn't break
builds on older (pre-POSIX) systems.

Are you 100% sure? It is not pre-POSIX system, it is pre new POSIX systems also. I am wondering why coreutils follow POSIX instead of the psedo- standard of what everyone else does?

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests
  - From: Paul Eggert

References:
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests
  - From: Paul Eggert
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: patch: contrib/compare_tests
  - From: Paul Eggert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]