This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: rtl_loop_init vs try_redirect_by_replacing_jump vs simple jumps

From: "Steven Bosscher" <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: "DJ Delorie" <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 00:38:26 +0200
Subject: Re: rtl_loop_init vs try_redirect_by_replacing_jump vs simple jumps
References: <200605230351.k4N3pKUY026394@greed.delorie.com> <571f6b510605222326k8b77078gcb38a5fd0787e9cd@mail.gmail.com> <571f6b510605222340t59c8cea3h2034cbd4ec2ba090@mail.gmail.com> <200605232138.k4NLcXcP032036@greed.delorie.com>

On 5/23/06, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:


> And, I forgot to say, one of the reasons that this keeps confusing
> people is because the rtl dumps in cfglayout mode tend to look
> confusing because there is almost no CFG information in them.

How about this?

        * cfgrtl.c (print_rtl_with_bb): Print predecessor and
        successor edge information as well.


That is much like what I had in mind, yes.  I can't approve it
obviously but it looks good to me.

Gr.
Steven

References:
- Re: rtl_loop_init vs try_redirect_by_replacing_jump vs simple jumps
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]