This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR25058 & PR25090 - was Re: CPU2000/191.fma3d compilation failure

From: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
To: Brooks Moses <bmoses at stanford dot edu>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:05:15 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR25058 & PR25090 - was Re: CPU2000/191.fma3d compilation failure
References: <756DFD3DE8F1D411A59A00306E06E84705CBEFDE@drfccad.cad.cea.fr> <446DF844.60102@stanford.edu>

Brooks,

I would interpret the standard to imply that that's legal code (assuming that a and c are never referenced via the bar entry).

- Brooks

I think that you are right. Your example exposes an even more severe problem with the dummy arguments of the suboutine. Bother, it's back to the drawing board.....

P.S. As a completely different thing: Is "parameters of the entry" the phrasing the standard uses? Fortran uses "parameter" for something quite different, so this seems likely to be confusing if it shows up in an error message or such.

OK I was trying to be concise; evidently I was not being precise!

I think that I am going to have to undo the original patch, whilst I get this sorted. Drat!

Paul

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR25058 & PR25090 - was Re: CPU2000/191.fma3d compilation failure
  - From: THOMAS Paul Richard 169137
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR25058 & PR25090 - was Re: CPU2000/191.fma3d compilation failure
  - From: Brooks Moses

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]