This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: {PING] [PATCH] Sign extension elimination


On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:23:21AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 09:39:23AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >> I'm not finding this discussion very illuminating.
> >>
> >> I'm trying to understand whether the current SEE pass is ready for
> >> inclusion in the compiler.  Roger has approved it on technical merits,
> >> but HJ has raised the issue that somehow this pass is a bad thing for
> >> x86-64.
> > 
> > The current SEE implemented isn't designed for x86-64 and doesn't help
> > x86-64 at all, if it doesn't make it worse on x86-64. But its
> > infrastructure is needed for future x86-64 SEE work.
> 
> OK.  So, then, there's no problem with incorporating the SEE
> implementation, and we proceed with that.
> 

Oh, it shouldn't be enabled for a target with any -On unless we can
demonstrate it does something useful.


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]