This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] new dg-effective-target(s) for >= 32 bits, plus testcase patches

From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: janis187 at us dot ibm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:15:28 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] new dg-effective-target(s) for >= 32 bits, plus testcase patches
References: <200604050237.k352bL2I022741@greed.delorie.com> <20060410231937.GA8815@us.ibm.com> <200604131954.k3DJsp7S029322@greed.delorie.com> <20060413215542.GA7295@us.ibm.com> <200604132244.k3DMie3i032330@greed.delorie.com>

On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 06:44:40PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > Something I missed last time is that dg-xfail-if and dg-skip-if
> > should specify "any" options with
> > 
> >   { "*" } { "" }
> 
> Is that documented anywhere?  I spent a while taking them all out at
> one point because I (erroneously) thought they were causing problems.

Amazingly enough, it is, in the "Test Directives" section of the GCC
Internals Manual; search for dg-xfail-if in sourcebuild.texi.

Janis

References:
- [patch] new dg-effective-target(s) for >= 32 bits, plus testcase patches
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [patch] new dg-effective-target(s) for >= 32 bits, plus testcase patches
  - From: Janis Johnson
- Re: [patch] new dg-effective-target(s) for >= 32 bits, plus testcase patches
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [patch] new dg-effective-target(s) for >= 32 bits, plus testcase patches
  - From: Janis Johnson
- Re: [patch] new dg-effective-target(s) for >= 32 bits, plus testcase patches
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]