This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, RFA, C++] ICE on ill-formed template_fun(&mem_fun) within template function
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, nathan at codesourcery dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 04:07:42 -0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFA, C++] ICE on ill-formed template_fun(&mem_fun) within template function
- References: <orslvtiuwu.fsf@livre.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orfyqnt0yg.fsf@livre.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <4390C46B.5090805@redhat.com> <or64oma6zx.fsf@livre.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orzmkl980p.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <43FA4F2F.6050602@codesourcery.com> <ormzf9d69a.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
On Mar 29, 2006, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> This alternate, much simpler patch, appears to fix the problem in
> mainline, by extending the code that matches ADDR_EXPR and
> COMPONENT_REF to avoid wrapping them in a NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR if their
> inner_expr is an overloaded function, to match ADDR_EXPR of
> COMPONENT_REF as well. I'm still testing it, but does it look
> like it might be a better fix for the problem?
FWIW, testing succeeded on amd64-linux-gnu. I was set off track for a
while because of the various failures in the trunk that looked like
regressions possibly related with the patch, but that turned out to
also be present without it.
> Red Hat bugzilla #168260 triggered an ICE on an ill-formed construct,
> taking the address of a non-static member function using an
> unqualified id, within a template function, and passing that as an
> argument in a function call requiring overload resolution. Fixing
> that uncovered a number of other situations in which we used to fail
> or to handle things differently within templates.
:ADDPATCH c++/template:
Red Hat bugzilla #168260 triggered an ICE on an ill-formed construct,
taking the address of a non-static member function using an
unqualified id, within a template function, and passing that as an
argument in a function call requiring overload resolution. Fixing
that uncovered a number of other situations in which we used to fail
or to handle things differently within templates.
for gcc/cp/ChangeLog
from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
* pt.c (build_non_dependent_expr): Leave ADDR_EXPR of
COMPONENT_REF alone.
for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
* g++.dg/template/dependent-expr5.C: New test.
Index: gcc/cp/pt.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/cp/pt.c.orig 2006-03-28 03:26:53.000000000 -0300
+++ gcc/cp/pt.c 2006-03-29 04:54:25.000000000 -0300
@@ -12894,10 +12894,11 @@ build_non_dependent_expr (tree expr)
return expr;
/* Preserve OVERLOADs; the functions must be available to resolve
types. */
- inner_expr = (TREE_CODE (expr) == ADDR_EXPR ?
- TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0) :
- TREE_CODE (expr) == COMPONENT_REF ?
- TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1) : expr);
+ inner_expr = expr;
+ if (TREE_CODE (inner_expr) == ADDR_EXPR)
+ inner_expr = TREE_OPERAND (inner_expr, 0);
+ if (TREE_CODE (inner_expr) == COMPONENT_REF)
+ inner_expr = TREE_OPERAND (inner_expr, 1);
if (is_overloaded_fn (inner_expr)
|| TREE_CODE (inner_expr) == OFFSET_REF)
return expr;
Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-expr5.C
===================================================================
--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-expr5.C 2006-03-29 04:29:34.000000000 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+// Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation
+// contributed by Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
+// inspired in the failure reported in Red Hat bugzilla #168260.
+
+template<class F> void bind(F f) {}
+
+template<class F> void bindm(F f) {}
+template<class F, class T> void bindm(F (T::*f)(void)) {} // { dg-error "note" }
+
+template<class F> void bindn(F f) {}
+template<class F, class T> void bindn(F (*f)(T)) {}
+
+template<class F> void bindb(F f) {}
+template<class F, class T> void bindb(F (*f)(T)) {} // { dg-error "note" }
+template<class F, class T> void bindb(F (T::*f)(void)) {} // { dg-error "note" }
+
+struct foo {
+ static int baist;
+ int bait;
+ void barf ();
+ static void barf (int);
+
+ struct bar {
+ static int baikst;
+ int baikt;
+ void bark ();
+ static void bark (int);
+
+ bar() {
+ bind (&baist);
+ bind (&foo::baist);
+ bind (&bait); // { dg-error "nonstatic data member" }
+ bind (&foo::bait);
+
+ bind (&baikst);
+ bind (&bar::baikst);
+ bind (&baikt); // ok, this->baikt
+ bind (&bar::baikt);
+
+ bind (&barf); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
+ bind (&foo::barf); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
+
+ bindm (&barf); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
+ bindm (&foo::barf);
+
+ bindn (&barf);
+ bindn (&foo::barf);
+
+ bindb (&barf);
+ bindb (&foo::barf); // { dg-error "ambiguous" }
+
+ bind (&bark); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
+ bind (&bar::bark); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
+
+ bindm (&bark); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
+ bindm (&bar::bark);
+
+ bindn (&bark);
+ bindn (&bar::bark);
+
+ bindb (&bark);
+ bindb (&bar::bark); // { dg-error "ambiguous" }
+ }
+ };
+
+ template <typename T>
+ struct barT {
+ static int baikst;
+ int baikt;
+ void bark ();
+ static void bark (int);
+
+ barT() {
+ bind (&baist);
+ bind (&foo::baist);
+ bind (&bait); // { dg-error "nonstatic data member" }
+ bind (&foo::bait);
+
+ bind (&baikst);
+ bind (&barT::baikst);
+ bind (&baikt); // ok, this->baikt
+ bind (&barT::baikt);
+
+ bind (&barf); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
+ bind (&foo::barf); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
+
+ bindm (&barf); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
+ bindm (&foo::barf);
+
+ bindn (&barf);
+ bindn (&foo::barf);
+
+ bindb (&barf);
+ bindb (&foo::barf); // { dg-error "ambiguous" }
+
+ bind (&bark); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
+ bind (&barT::bark); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
+
+ bindm (&bark); // { dg-error "no matching function" }
+ bindm (&barT::bark);
+
+ bindn (&bark);
+ bindn (&barT::bark);
+
+ bindb (&bark);
+ bindb (&barT::bark); // { dg-error "ambiguous" }
+ }
+ };
+
+ bar bard;
+ barT<void> bart;
+} bad;
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Secretary for FSF Latin America http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}