This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Question on PR26890, possible regression.
- From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
- Cc: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:11:10 -0700
- Subject: Re: Question on PR26890, possible regression.
- References: <20060407142729.GC16307@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <4436B5DD.9090108@verizon.net> <20060407193722.GE16307@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <4436DD2A.5060202@verizon.net>
Jerry DeLisle wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. I will commit the fix to put pad back where
it belongs shortly under the obvious rule. I will also had a note
explaining this connection back to the frontend. I will check the size
of the pad relative to the size of the other union to see where we stand.
Padding size reverted, this only affected trunk.
2006-04-07 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libgfortran/26890
* io/io.h: Revert change to pad size made on 2006-03-30.
Add comment explaining dependency with fortran/trans-io.c.
Jerry