This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libgfortran, configury] BLAS-based implementation of matmul

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:34:37 -0700
Subject: Re: [libgfortran, configury] BLAS-based implementation of matmul
References: <442EA0BE.9050609@gmail.com> <48C44FC0-E7D1-4472-BEFD-7EBBBE249CE5@apple.com> <20060404040058.GA1718@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

On Apr 3, 2006, at 9:00 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:

Are you saying that the STL provided by GCC is optimized for all architectures supported by gcc?

No.

OTOH, FX is doing the hard work and whatever he decides to pursue
is up to him.

I'm all for that...

References:
- [libgfortran, configury] BLAS-based implementation of matmul
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [libgfortran, configury] BLAS-based implementation of matmul
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: [libgfortran, configury] BLAS-based implementation of matmul
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]