This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch] Add option to reduce amount of reflection data to gcj...
- From: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
- To: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCJ Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:13:56 +0530
- Subject: Re: [Patch] Add option to reduce amount of reflection data to gcj...
- Openpgp: url=http://ranjitmathew.hostingzero.com/aa_6C114B8F.txt
- References: <44152B28.5060700@avtrex.com> <17429.30463.268964.356308@zapata.pink> <44176FD6.9070201@avtrex.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[Some nitpicking from a Texinfo newbie and enthusiast.]
David Daney wrote:
>
> +@item -freduced-reflection
The rest of the options in this list also do not follow this,
but still: Shouldn't this be "@item @option{-freduced-reflection}"
instead?
> +For code that does not use reflection (i.e. the methods in the
> +@code{java.lang.reflect} package), @code{-freduced-reflection}
> +will result in proper operation with a savings in executable code size.
> +
> +JNI (@code{-fjni}) and the binary compatibility ABI
> +(@code{-findirect-dispatch}) do not work properly without full
> +reflection meta-data. Because of this, it is an error to use these options
> +with @code{-freduced-reflection}.
"@option{-fjni}" instead of "@code{-fjni}",
"@option{-findirect-dispatch}" instead of "@code{-findirect-dispatch}",
etc.
Thanks,
Ranjit.
- --
Ranjit Mathew Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com
Bangalore, INDIA. Web: http://rmathew.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEF6mcYb1hx2wRS48RApXeAKCHCw/wvj414I7OBAziYTW12LEoHACfaCX4
DZjvHYnlXzeQSyv4WYeCKPk=
=M0sR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----