This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: add 'pex_write_input' to libiberty pipeline library


DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> writes:
> I suppose we could poison PEX_CONCURRENT for gcc, too.  Ok, post a
> patch with sufficent warning messages and such, for review.

Okay.  I may not be able to get to that immediately, but I'll have it
within the month.

> /me wonders if a new API that does nothing but open a bidirectional
> pipe to a concurrent program would be useful?  If it did nothing else,
> it would discourage its use elsewhere, and programs like gcc could
> define a local version that just fails, to stop people from using it
> there.

Well, again, we'd really like to share code with pex-win32.c.  We
don't really need a pipeline, so a completely separate
pex_run_concurrent function that just used the existing 'funcs' vtable
would probably be okay.  But it seems a shame to segregate it from the
rest of the pipeline construction; it all works.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]