This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, fortran] PR19546 - References to parent function results.
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "'fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:05:35 -0800
- Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR19546 - References to parent function results.
- References: <43F25A20.2020706@wanadoo.fr>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 11:30:56PM +0100, Paul Thomas wrote:
>
> I rather think that gfc_trans_omp_variable can have the same treatment as
> gfc_conv_variable but I do not feel at all competent to judge if references
> to parent results is compatible with OMP and still less to write the test
> cases. I have therefore added a TODO to this function so that Jakub can
> deal with it when his workload allows.
It would be great if we can Jakub's attention, here.
OTOH, I've bootstrapped and regression tested your
patch of amd64-*-freebsd with no new regressions.
The problems with alternate returns appears to be
covered by another PR.
> Regtested on FC3/Athlon. OK for trunk?
OK.
--
Steve